Monday, September 2, 2013

Understanding Soil Microbiology

The study of soil microbiology as it relates to forensic science is a relatively novel idea. While DNA, dental records, and trace evidence has been used to determine identities of both suspects and victims, along with location of crime scene and other details, soil could potentially be used to determine if a victim was placed in a location then removed. By studying the microbial composition of soils around a decomposing body, scientists will be able to track the fluctuations and changes of microbes from the soil. Using this data, it could be determined how old a dump site location is, or if someone reported a dump site, this data could support or disprove such claims.
First, it is important that scientists understand the basics of normal soil microbiology. Soil microbiology was once studied by sampling soil sites and simply counting microbes from the samples [1]. This was not sufficient enough to develop a better understanding of the microbial composition of the soil.  Since these methods were not efficient enough, soil enzymes were studied. Because the presence of enzymes in the soil is indicative of the presence of microbes, it is important to study the enzymes that are found. By studying these enzymes, and through the knowledge of microbiology, scientists are able to link the enzymes with certain bacteria that undergo various enzymatic activities in order to survive in the soil [1].
Enzyme testing is not without its faults, however. Simply using the enzymes found in the soil and a background of microbiology will not show, for certain, which microbes can be classified as being present in the soil [1]. Instead of using enzymatic testing as confirmatory and characterizing tests, scientists will use the data gathered from these methods to monitor various details of the soil. Various approaches to testing soil have been proposed over the years in efforts to more clearly classify the microbiota of soil. Through enzymatic testing and metabolic analysis, the compositions of soils are better understood than they were fifty years ago, but the complete classification is still out of grasp.
Even more recently developed, DNA sequencing of soil samples has proven to be a relatively well informative method for determining what, and just how many, microbes compose the soil. While there are several methods which are currently used to study the DNA or RNA of soil microbiology, several in the science community have supported the ideas that molecular ecology is essential for the study of soil microbiology [1]. The future of understanding the microbiology of soil is still geared towards the continued study of microbial composition and activities through the use of molecular techniques [1]. Due to the vast contrast between the many soil types, along with the added complexities from climate, altitude, and geographic location, the complete composition of soil microbiota may never be absolutely determined. Along with all these complicating factors, the changes that are constantly taking place in these factors will continue to keep the soil microbiology from being completely determined.
By knowing the basics of soil microbiology, scientists should one day be able to more widely apply what is known in order to utilize soil from forensic cases to determine a variety of evidentiary information. Through the knowledge of general soil characteristics, scientists can already begin to study forensic applications for this information in efforts to utilize another route of evidence to help solve crimes. Because we already see widespread changes in crime scenes from the more well known aspects of crime investigation due to television, perhaps developing new techniques to uncovering clues will prove to be beneficial not only to the scientific community, but the criminal justice community as well.

Resources:
1. Insam, H. (2001). Developments in soil microbiology since the mid 1960s. Geoderma, 100, 389-402.

4 comments:

  1. This is interesting to me because I am a Forensic Chemistry major with Biology and CJ minors.

    I do agree that this field of science has already started to be, and will continue to be, a major component to crime scenes involved with outdoor locations.

    Scientists were already able to tell small things about soil from crime scenes; such as, different types of soils found in places that were not their native area shows movement of the body. Now, with this new research using microbes, the prosecution will have a stronger case against the suspect due to the more intricate details given by this study, further narrowing down the possibilities and doubts.

    Studies like this goes to show that forensics is ever evolving and getting better hopefully decreasing people's willingness to commit a crime knowing the possibility to get caught is getting higher daily.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow! this is amazing. I honestly had no idea there was such a study where one can find out details of a crime scene. Though I'm just curious, how can one tell how long a body has been decomposing? I know you mentioned microbes in the soil but I wonder what methods are used to acquire that info.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, that's what we're trying to figure out. Most of my blogs will probably tie into all of this, so maybe we'll be able to see the progression of such studies. The aim in this sort of research is more so to discover a dump site or crime scene where no body is present. If the body is present, there is a lot more information out there regarding the human microbiome during decomposition that could be utilized in determining how far decomp has progressed. With the soil studies, we are trying to determine the evolution and shifts between bacterial communities in an effort to see if it is even possible to determine this sort of information. As far as molecular techniques in testing the microbial composition, PCR and pyrosequencing are popular methods to identify the microbes.

      Delete
  3. Metagenomic approaches can only become better as studies add metagenomes to databases. I, for one, am looking forward to the development of methods that compare samples of metagenomes to look for bioindicator genes and species.

    ReplyDelete